Friday, February 15, 2008

Take our files, raw.

Short. Here's a page of our raw graphics files. If you find that fun, have some. If you make an interesting change, all the better.

Long. We believe in openness. But openness is a process. It's not so much that openness is difficult or painful* it's that openness is non-obvious. You don't see each successive layer until you remove the one above it.

Since the site started, we've enjoyed kibitzing about how it should look. We'd talk about layout and design. We'd throw up an image and sit back for reactions. Occasionally a user would get inspired and post what they thought something should look like. We just concluded a great exchange about the new "Author" and "Legacy" badges. Members helped us refine the wording and the colors enormously.

Open, right? But wait! Why didn't we post our raw images for members to play with, if they wanted? You can talk about a GIF, but that's like asking people to have conversations about a prepared speech.

Frankly, until now, I never even thought of the idea. I've never heard of a company that did it. And although it happens on open source projects, it's not universal. The Open Library project, for example, is a model of openness. You can download both code and data; but you won't find any design files on the site.

So, why not? We don't lose trademark or copyright by posting a raw Photoshop file, with layers and alternate versions, anymore than we lose them by posting GIFs and JPEGs. What is the potential downside? Just in case there's any confusing, we've posted a notice about copyright and trademark, but also granted explicit permission to make changes and blog about them.

So, here's a wiki page for us to post our raw graphics files, and users to view, edit and remix them. It's a very selective list so far, mostly because I started with what was lying around my on my desktop.**

More, much deeper openness coming next week...


*Although maintaining the "What I did today?" page proved too much work, and it helps that I have very thick skin for most criticism.
**There's a side-benefit to putting all the files up on the wiki. Last time I lost my hard drive I lost almost no work—it's all up on the "cloud" these days—except for my Photoshop files.

Labels: , , ,

6 Comments:

Blogger EBarney said...

Not a terribly important point, but since you aren't using the Twitter feature anymore, don't you think it's about time to take it off the blog page? 157 days ago just looks funny for something that's supposed to be so immediate.

2/18/2008 2:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I may be on the wrong page, but in searching for Ben King's book Think About It!: 30 short stories, I discovered there are two Ben Kings. The one who wrote Think About It is an American storyteller, highly reviewed by Writer's Digest and others; the other guy may be British and I'm not familiar with his work. Maybe I'll order one of his books and see for myself - thanks

2/24/2008 9:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

LibraryThing,

I could not figure out how to leave my feedback elsewhere. I just logged on and found out that I am not able to add any more books as I have reached the "free limit" of 200 books. To enter more, I must subscribe for a yearly fee (probably auto renews unless I go and explicitly opt-out).

Unfortunately for you, I was not informed about the "free for the first 200 books" limit prior to my spending hours and hours entering the 211 books I could recall off the top of my head I had read. Perhaps your warning was "hidden" or intentionally non-obvious. For me, that is the same as not being informed. For you it is the same effect, I am departing your service.

I have absolutely no intention of paying you for the priviledge of my updating my own list of books. Are you freakin INSANE?! Good luck with your model (ROTFLMAO - still living in the 1990's with your charging models, I can see).

Just to be clear, I have deleted all of my books and intend for my account to go dormant.

Thank you for the great idea. I am saddened you chose to charge the $10 a month. I don't think I am the only client who feels this way. I am just one in a hundred that is vocal about my choice.


Jim

3/23/2008 12:25 AM  
Blogger Tim said...

For a response to that comment, posted on ten blog posts, despite the fact that ever team member's email is posted on the blog and there are whole groups devoted to feedback, see http://www.librarything.com/blog/2008/03/all-things-considered-does-librarything.php .

3/23/2008 2:43 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Do you have one of those teeny tiny icons that you use for your favicon? With just the big 'L'?

8/11/2008 1:13 PM  
Blogger Tim said...

http://www.librarything.com/favicon.ico

8/11/2008 1:30 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home